The comments in Angie's editorial in the current issue [April '07] re the 'craft' debate made me think - what category do I fit into?
I finished a ceramics degree last summer, but am currently concentrating on making my jewellery and fused glass. I make a wide range of jewellery, freshwater pearl bridal sets to chinese knotted pieces and fused glass. The chinese knotting is not 'ideas and skill-laden' and I am certainly not a highly trained professional in it so this would probably be classified as 'hobby'.
I also make fused glass coasters and bowls using bought molds. My work is led by ideas of colour and design, but certainly not highly skilled, so which is it? craft or hobby? I am developing more ambitious projects and ideas in different areas of glass fusing and slumping, but the fact of the matter is that the craft-hobby debate is very muddy water.
We can all think of what the difference is between 'hobby' low skill work, and design and skills led craft, but trying to create a worded definition seems to be nigh on impossible.
Where is the boundary on the amount of skill used? To me, making what I currently make requires little skill, but to my partner, even when I explain what I am doing he still thinks that it is incredibly difficult and skillful. So perhaps our problem is that to us makers, we can see the differences between ideas and skill laden work and 'hobby' made pieces but to those who do not make there is no difference because they are not directly involved in any making process and do not or cannot appreciate the skills level (or lack of) between two pieces of work within even one discipline let alone several.
Hence perhaps the reason for The Guardian's 'Guide to Craft'?
Jess